Families' Heartache Over Coastal Degradation Threatening Coastal Norfolk Graves
Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.
A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards
Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”
Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles
A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Grave in Peril
Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.
“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”
She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Searching for Solutions and Clarity
An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.
Several families are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.
“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”
A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”
It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”
The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.